Why MySQL is a Better Database Management Option Than MS SQL Server

MySQL vs MS SQL Server

MySQL vs MS SQL ServerMicrosoft has a knack of developing software solutions that offer ease of use. The company has been moving forward consistently and has edged out its competitors in various perspectives. When it comes to MS SQL Server, you will find the same level of scalability and flexibility that is quintessential for any data management tool. When we talk of MS SQL, it is one of the other big attractions in the same market, driving users for its reliability and high performance characteristics. MySQL is good in its own right and has SQL Server beat in various respects. Let us elaborate the areas where MySQL wins over SQL:

Installation and Configuration

When comparing two database systems, installation isn’t a big determinant. However, this is important in situations when you commission and upgrade multiple servers. All it takes for MySQL to get installed on the WIN boxes and then switch to the command utility prompt is five minutes. On the other hand, MS SQL Server takes significant amount of time. If you head for installing just the .NET framework, it may consume five times of what is required to install MySQL server on your test machine.

Another consideration that is important is having multiple instances of a server on the same machine. It is a cinch to have multiple instances of MySQL server on the same box. You need to get hold of two things here: I. You need to install different versions of MySQL in different directories, II. In case you have a need to run multiple instances of the server, you need to use a different connection port for every install. Moreover, MySQL server install does not require using Windows Server as is the case with various versions of MS SQL Server Enterprise.

Finally, configuration is relatively easy for MySQL server as the config palms for MySQL can be immediately set using the command line prompt, while the SQL Server administrators have to get it done using the SQL Server Management Studio.

Core Microsoft SQL Server and MySQL Features

MS SQL Server has seen significant improvements since its first version. Microsoft aims to bring a comprehensive set of features to the users and enhance their working experience with SQL Server. On the contrary, MySQL isn’t concerned with making the application more feature rich. Instead, it stands on the three pillars of reliability, performance, and ease-of-use. Giving much importance to these priorities, MySQL is optimized with new features only when they contribute to strengthen these three areas. MySQL server has also improved its core functionality and introduced some of the more boutique features of a database server. However, when it comes to the above three priorities, MySQL is certainly the right choice.

Storage Engines

This is where MySQL can clearly edge out MS SQL Server. MySQL offers high performance and flexibility owing to its pluggable storage engine architecture. With MySQL storage engines, you have the choice to create database tables that are transactional or not, compress data or not, and more. With this level of flexibility, you have greater chances of improving your performance and adaptability for your applications. It is easy to switch between these storage engines. Apart from MySQL, there are other vendors that develop storage engines in order to power the database applications smoothly.

Besides the aforementioned comparisons, there are other areas (such as high availability features, cost, ubiquity of MySQL, implementation models, adaptability with Windows platform), which make MySQL superior to SQL Server. Transitioning from MS SQL Server to MySQL depends entirely on your needs and production environment.


It is war between these two database system. if you ask me, which is the best among these two then a database which fulfill all my requirement then it is the best for me!!

What is your rating for this article?
- Total: 0 Average: 0

Leave a Reply